What is the odds ratio for p53-mediated cell cycle gene regulation in an enrichment analysis using gseapy with Reactome_2022 using all statistically differentially expressed genes from a pydeseq2 analysis that includes all related treatment groups (DMSO, DMSO_Serum_starvation, Cisplatin_IC50_CBD_IC50, Cisplatin_IC50_CBD_IC50_Serum_starvation_16h) for proper dispersion estimation, after pre-filtering to keep only genes with counts greater than 10 in at least one of all 30 samples, (padj<=0.05, absolute lfc>=0.5, baseMean>=10) between CBD/cisplatin combination treatment and DMSO?
Accepted answer
5.81 or 5.84
Domain
transcriptomics
Comparison
Pass counts and token totals across the same three replicates.
Unrequested custom enrichment universeThis run supplied a custom 19,073/19,074-gene background to GSEApy and obtained 5.817980. The task does not request a custom universe; the standard amd64 route returns 5.812406, which rounds to the accepted 5.81.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published two-decimal rule. The observed 5.817980 rounds to 5.82, not the accepted amd64 result 5.81.
Codex GPT-5.6 Luna
replicate 3
failUDT + standard tools
Why it missed
Unrequested custom enrichment universeThis run supplied a custom 19,073/19,074-gene background to GSEApy and obtained 5.817980. The task does not request a custom universe; the standard amd64 route returns 5.812406, which rounds to the accepted 5.81.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published two-decimal rule. The observed 5.817980 rounds to 5.82, not the accepted amd64 result 5.81.
DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex
3 primary replicates
DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex
replicate 1
fail
Evaluation status
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Answer7.172895157772285
Workflow
Galaxy via BioBlend→GSEApy→PyDESeq2→Enrichr→Reactome
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Answer5.8591207373971095
Workflow
Galaxy via BioBlend→SciPy→statsmodels→GSEApy→PyDESeq2
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Answernot produced
Workflow
Galaxy via BioBlend→GSEApy→PyDESeq2→Enrichr→Reactome
Identifier and background scope changedThis run used 679 foreground symbols and a 20,090-gene background instead of 656 unique mapped symbols and a 19,074-gene universe. The larger contingency table changed the odds ratio from 5.812 to 5.922.
Identifier and background scope changedThis run's Ensembl mapping and enrichment background produced an odds ratio of 5.846. The stable mapped foreground and universe produce 5.840 on this architecture.
Identifier and background scope changedThis run changed which mapped genes entered the foreground or Reactome universe, producing an odds ratio of 6.128 instead of the accepted 5.81/5.84 result.
DE gene set changedThis run selected 654 unique mapped DE genes rather than the stable 653-gene arm64 foreground and reported 5.831005. Under the published exact two-decimal rule, 5.83 is neither accepted platform result, 5.81 or 5.84.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published two-decimal rule. The observed 5.831005 rounds to 5.83, which is neither accepted platform result, 5.81 or 5.84.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published platform-aware rule. The observed 5.840348 rounds to the accepted arm64 result, 5.84.
Codex GPT-5.6 Luna
replicate 2
fail
Why it missed
DE gene set changedThis run selected 654 unique mapped DE genes rather than the stable 653-gene arm64 foreground and reported 5.831005. It rounds to 5.83, outside the accepted platform values 5.81 and 5.84.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published two-decimal rule. The observed 5.831005 rounds to 5.83, which is neither accepted platform result, 5.81 or 5.84.
Scoring review: Re-scored under the published platform-aware rule. The observed 5.840348 rounds to the accepted arm64 result, 5.84.
DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex
3 primary replicates
DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex
replicate 1
fail
Evaluation status
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Manual review pendingThe evaluator marked this answer incorrect. The answer, workflow summary, usage, and available run records are linked, but a manual root-cause audit has not yet been added.
Identifier and background scope changedThis run used a different identifier mapping, foreground, or enrichment universe from the stable route. Because the odds ratio depends on the full background table, that scope change moved the result outside the accepted 5.81/5.84 values.
Identifier and background scope changedThis run used a different identifier mapping, foreground, or enrichment universe from the stable route. Because the odds ratio depends on the full background table, that scope change moved the result outside the accepted 5.81/5.84 values.
Identifier and background scope changedThis run used a different identifier mapping, foreground, or enrichment universe from the stable route. Because the odds ratio depends on the full background table, that scope change moved the result outside the accepted 5.81/5.84 values.
Open-ended code averaged 1.44M tokens; previous website Galaxy averaged 1.32M; the new Galaxy runs averaged 0.89M, or 0.62× Open-ended code. Each mean covers three replicates of this same task with GPT-5.6 Sol.
Cached input is already included in input tokens. Full nested tool/job evidence is in each HF run's galaxy_execution_records.tar.gz, with an accompanying member index.